We follow a strict honesty policy. However, to fund our work, we use affiliate advertising links on this blog.
In this Mailchimp vs AWeber comparison, I’m going to look at two of the best-known email marketing solutions currently available — and help you work out which one is the best fit for your business.
Read on to get a full overview of both Mailchimp and AWeber’s feature set and exactly why — and when — you might decide to use one of these tools over the other.
Let’s start off with an important question…
What do AWeber and Mailchimp do?
AWeber and Mailchimp are email marketing tools that allow you to:
import and host a mailing list and capture data onto it using sign-up forms
create newsletters that can be sent to your subscribers
automate your messaging to subscribers via use of email autoresponders
review statistics related to your email marketing campaigns – open rate, click through, forwards etc.
…and much else besides.
But how much does this functionality cost?
There are two types of plan available in AWeber: ‘Free’ and ‘Pro.’
The free plan allows you to use most of the features of AWeber, so long as your list is 500 or less subscribers in size. You can access this here.
With regard to AWeber Pro, the costs for using it are as follows:
Hosting and emailing a list containing up to 500 subscribers: $19.99 per month
501 to 2,500 subscribers: $29.99 per month
2,501 to 5,000 subscribers: $49.99 per month
5,001 to 10,000 subscribers: $69.99 per month
10,001 to 25,000 subscribers: $149.99 per month
If your list contains over 25,000 subscribers, you will need to call AWeber for a quotation.
There are four Mailchimp plans, each with a very different set of features, and the cost of using each depends on how many records you have.
The plans are as follows:
Essentials — from $11 per month
Standard — from $17 per month
Premium — from $299.99 per month
The key differences between the Mailchimp tiers involve:
he maximum number of subscribers you can have on your mailing list — up to 2k on the free plan, 50k on ‘Essentials,’ 100k on ‘Standard’and 200,000+ on ‘Premium.’
ccount users — the free plan limits you to 1; ‘Essentials’ to 3; ‘Standard’ to 5 (the ‘Premium’ plan places no limits on these)
Send limits — the number of messages you can send varies depending on the plan you’re on (from 10k on the free plan up to 3m on the Premium plan)
- Customer journey automation — the fully-fledged version of this is only available on the ‘Standard’ plan or higher
Support — you can only avail of this fully on paid plans(the free plan does provide support but it is limited to the first 30 days of account usage)
Advanced segmentation — this is only available on the ‘Premium’ plan
Reporting — comparative reporting features are only available on the ‘Premium’ plan
A/B testing — this is only available on paid plans
Advanced split testing — this is only available on the ‘Premium’ plan.
An interesting option for users who mail their databases relatively infrequently is Mailchimp’s ‘Pay as You Go’ plan, where you pay a set fee per email sent.
Exact pricing varies by territory, and the functionality you get is the same as that provided on the ‘Essentials’ plan.
The pay-as-you-go model won’t be for everyone, but it’s potentially useful for users who are not interested in making use of autoresponders and only wish to send ad hoc, one-off blasts.
A similar pay-as-you-go option is not currently available in AWeber.
So which works out cheaper?
If your only purpose of using an email marketing tool is to send occasional newsletters to a reasonably small database, then Mailchimp lets you do this a bit cheaper than AWeber, via its ‘Essentials’ plan (which involves a $11 monthly fee to AWeber’s $19.99).
You won’t be able to use advanced email automation on it, or code your own templates, but it will let you carry out basic email marketing perfectly well.
However, in order to compare like with like, you really need to look at how Mailchimp’s ‘Standard’ plans stack up against AWeber’s ‘Pro’ offering — and, once you have more than 500 subscribers on your list, they work out more expensive across the board ($25-$110 per month more expensive!).
Send limits in Mailchimp
Unlike AWeber — which allows you to send an unlimited number of emails per month — Mailchimp now caps the number of e-newsletters you can send every month.
These limits vary according to plan, but if you have a lot of autoresponder cycles going on, or send a lot of ad hoc email blasts, you will need to bear them in mind — especially if you are on the ‘Essentials’ plan, which features considerably lower send limits than all the other Mailchimp plans.
Of course, you could theoretically use either product for free — so let’s take a quick look at the free plans on offer from AWeber and Mailchimp.
The Mailchimp ‘Free’ plan is one of the strongest reasons why you might want to choose Mailchimp as an email marketing solution: it lets you send e-newsletters to a mailing list containing 2,000 contacts entirely for free.
However, there are some important things to be aware of with regard to this plan:
AWeber free plan
Perhaps in a bid to compete with Mailchimp, AWeber recently introduced an entirely free plan too.
This manages to be both less generous AND more generous than the Mailchimp plan.
It’s more generous because with the exception of a couple of key features (notably split testing and abandoned cart emails), you get access to the bulk of AWeber’s functionality entirely free.
Mailchimp’s free plan, as discussed above, restricts functionality to a few core features.
AWeber is less generous in that its free plan is only available to you if your list is 500 contacts or less in size; this compares negatively with Mailchimp’s 2,000 limit.
Like Mailchimp, AWeber’s free plan features is ad-supported, but the branding is pretty subtle.
You can try the free AWeber plan out here.
Something to watch out for — subscriber count!
There is something rather sneaky in both the Mailchimp and AWeber pricing structures: both platforms include unsubscribed contacts when calculating your list size.
So, for example, if you have 1,000 active subscribers, and 200 unsubscribed contacts in your account, both Mailchimp and AWeber will consider you to have a list containing 1,200 subscribers — and charge you accordingly.
Other leading competing email marketing solutions, such as GetResponse, only charge for hosting active subscribers.
To be fair, you can always delete the unsubscribed contacts, but this means remembering to do it — and unnecessary work.
Autoresponders and marketing automation in Mailchimp and AWeber
Autoresponders are e-newsletters that are sent to your mailing list subscribers at pre-defined intervals.
For example, you can set them up so that straight after somebody signs up to your list, they receive a welcome or ‘onboarding’ message from your business; a week later they could receive a promo code for specific products; two weeks later they could receive an encouragement to follow you on social media.
And so on!
The idea behind autoresponders is that much of your email marketing gets automated – it’s a sort of ‘set and forget’ scenario that saves you the bother sending out e-newsletters manually (although you can still of course do this as and when required).
Both Mailchimp and AWeber allow you to create simple ‘time-based’ autoresponders — a series of emails based on time intervals (as discussed above).
I’d argue that for this kind of autoresponder, AWeber makes things a bit easier — setting up automation in Mailchimp can be slightly fiddly (as there are more options to wade through) whereas AWeber’s ‘Campaigns’ tool, which is used to create your autoresponder workflow, is very easy to use.
However, to properly compare Mailchimp and AWeber’s autoresponder functionality, we need to look beyond traditional ‘drip’ style autoresponders and look more closely at the idea of marketing automation — something that has been introduced into many email marketing solutions over the past couple of years.
Marketing automation works in a similar way to autoresponders, in that emails are automatically sent to a mailing list according to a predefined sequence.
But instead of time intervals, user behaviour is used to determine what should emails should be sent next — opens, clicks, goal completions, purchases, abandoned carts and more can all be used to trigger the next e-newsletter.
As things stand, Mailchimp offers significantly more functionality when it comes to marketing automation: you can use its sophisticated ‘customer journey’ tool to create a series of messages that are sent on an ‘if this then that’ basis.
AWeber’s marketing automation feature, ‘AWeber Campaigns,’ is currently far more basic in nature — you can only use tags and clicks to create automated user journeys with it.
As an aside, I would argue that both products a bit behind their rival GetResponse in the marketing automation stakes (especially AWeber).
This is because GetResponse now bundles ‘conversion funnels’ and webinar hosting into its plans, and you can integrate marketing automation with both. You can find out more about all this here.
As discussed above, a key thing to be aware of if you are hoping to create autoresponders with either Mailchimp or AWeber is that the customer journey feature is only fully available on the more expensive Mailchimp plans — ‘Standard’ or higher. (You can access a basic version of it on the ‘Essentials’ plan, but it doesn’t facilitate the ‘if this, then that’ rules that differentiate marketing automation from autoresponders).
And using Mailchimp’s ‘Standard’ plan typically works out $25 to $110 more expensive per month than the AWeber equivalent.
To be fair, you’ll get more advanced autoresponder functionality for this, but if all you’re looking for a tool to send simple e-newsletters or create a basic drip campaign, AWeber works out considerably cheaper.
Now, let’s move onto the visual side of things.
Both AWeber and Mailchimp offer a wide range of e-newsletter templates, which are designed to suit many different applications and organisation types — ecommerce, events, sports, education and so on.
AWeber offers far more templates than Mailchimp, however — around 700 to 85 respectively.
With both systems you can tweak the templates extensively, and indeed code your own, so users of both platforms should be able to settle on a template which works for their business without too much difficulty.
However, and as mentioned above, you’ll pay a premium to do so with Mailchimp.
All the email templates provided by both products are responsive, meaning that they will automatically resize themselves to suit the device your e-newsletter is being viewed on.
A ‘preview’ mode is also available for both Mailchimp and AWeber that lets you see how your e-newsletter will look on a mobile device.
In terms of quality, I’d argue that some of Mailchimp’s templates look a bit more contemporary than AWeber’s. But there’s not a huge amount in it.
Web fonts in Mailchimp and AWeber
Both Mailchimp and AWeber now allow you to make use of web fonts — something which not all other leading email marketing apps let you do (many tend to restrict you to more boring fonts like Times New Roman, Arial and so on).
Web fonts are useful because they can improve the look and feel of e-newsletter considerably; and depending on the typefaces you use on your website, may help you achieve a greater brand consistency between your site and your e-newsletters.
Both Mailchimp and AWeber allow you to make use of the following web fonts:
Source Sans Pro
So if you use any of the above on your website, you’re in luck — you can add them to your e-newsletters too and keep the branding consistency tight.
AWeber gives you one additional typeface, ‘Permanent Marker,’ a brash font which is something of an acquired taste — but potentially handy to have in your design arsenal nonetheless.
So a slight win for AWeber here.
My hope is that at some point the range of fonts available in both Mailchimp and AWeber will be expanded somewhat, as the above selection is a little bit on the dull side, but a general thumbs up to both products for allowing users to make use of web fonts in e-newsletters; not all competing products do.
Download our free Business Growth E-Kit
For a limited time, we’re offering our readers some excellent free tools to help them grow their business. Sign up free to immediately receive:
- downloadable cheatsheets on how to grow an online business
- an exclusive discount code for email marketing app GetResponse
- extended free trials of essential growth-hacking apps
- ongoing free tips and advice on digital marketing
We respect your privacy, and you can unsubscribe any time. View privacy notice.
AMP for email in Mailchimp and AWeber
An area where AWeber has an edge over Mailchimp — and indeed most other email marketing platforms —involves something called AMP for email.
In the past, e-newsletters have been very static affairs — a simple combination of text and images.
AMP for Email changes all that by making it possible for recipients to take actions — like booking an appointment or RSVP-ing to an event — directly within the email (i.e., without leaving their email program and without visiting an external website).
It also allows the senders of an email to insert live, dynamic content into it — think survey results, weather updates, football scores etc.
This ‘dynamic’ nature of AMP e-newsletters gives recipients a reason to return to them from time to time — turning emails into much more powerful and engaging pieces of content.
The below video from Google about AMP for email is worth checking out.
The AWeber and Mailchimp interfaces
AWeber takes quite a traditional approach to its user interface — when you log in, you encounter a primary navigation bar on the left hand side of the screen containing all the key options.
Hovering over these menu items then reveals sub-menus that let you ‘get at’ important secondary options (for example, email templates, import options and statistics).
Mailchimp’s interface is more ‘funky’ in design, with icons on the left that when clicked on bring up features or data on the right.
The two interfaces also differ when it comes to font size and use of white space: Mailchimp uses really big typefaces and lots of white space.
Whilst aesthetically this makes for a ‘cleaner’ and more attractive user interface, in my experience it also means a bit more clicking and scrolling about the place to find what you’re looking for.
And the icons used in Mailchimp’s main menu means that there’s a bit of guesswork as to what they represent involved.
With AWeber, by contrast, all the important options are easily identifiable the moment you log in.
So despite the fact that the Mailchimp interface is undoubtedly easier on the eye, actually locating key functionality is arguably a bit harder to do.
One aspect of Mailchimp’s interface that I do really like however is its content studio — a place where you can upload assets (images, files and so on) to the platform which can then be incorporated into emails really easily as you create campaign.
The bottom line on these interfaces is that you’ll probably be fine with either. If working in a contemporary online environment is important to you, you’ll probably prefer Mailchimp’s; if you’re a fan of traditional menus, you’ll probably prefer AWeber’s.
Opt-in processes in AWeber and Mailchimp
There are two ways you can add subscribers to a mailing list: using a ‘single opt-in’ or a ‘double opt-in’ process.
When you use a single opt-in process, the person completing your sign-up form is added to your mailing list immediately.
With a double opt-in process, the person signing up to your list is sent an email containing a confirmation link that he or she must click before they are subscribed.
The main benefits of a single opt-in process are that
it makes it easy for users to subscribe
it generally improves conversion rates and leads to more people joining your list
A double opt-in process is better for
keeping ‘spam’ and ‘fake’ email addresses to a minimum (because everybody on the list has to prove that their email addresses are real)
improving the accuracy of reports (because open rates are based on the actions of subscribers with real email addresses, not a bunch of fake emails).
For some time, AWeber had a big edge over Mailchimp in this area, because it allowed users to make use of either a single or a double opt-in approach.
Mailchimp eventually changed its tune however, allowing its customers to use a single opt-in approach, because the company found that 61% of users completing double opt in data capture forms were not completing their sign up process.
So a thumbs up to both products for the flexibility in this area. Not all competing products provide single opt-in functionality, so it’s great to see both AWeber and Mailchimp doing so.
A key part of managing a mailing list involves creating segments and sending e-newsletters to them.
Both Mailchimp and AWeber allow you to create segments based on your preferred criteria — but what they don’t do is let you send to multiple segments at once.
Let’s say you’re a Volkswagen dealer with a mailing list containing a field called ‘car model.’
You’ve used field this to segment your mailing list neatly into the owners of VW Polos, Golfs, Passats, Tiguans etc. You have a special offer which is relevant to Polo and Golf owners, and you want to send this message to those two segments in one go.
But with AWeber and Mailchimp (any plan except ‘Premium’)…you can’t. You’ll have to go and create a brand new segment for people who own Polos OR Golfs.
Now, this might not seem like a serious problem, but if you regularly need to send mailouts to multiple (and varying) segments of subscribers then you will potentially have more work to do than you might like.
If segmentation is a very important aspect of how you manage your mailouts, then I’d probably look elsewhere for an email marketing solution. The two products I’ve come across which cater best for emailing multiple segments (and indeed lists) are GetResponse and Campaign Monitor.
To be fair, you can get some advanced segmentation functionality with Mailchimp — but at a price (you’ll need to be on the prohibitively expensive Mailchimp ‘Premium’ plan, which starts at a whopping $299 per month!).
If you’ve got the budget for it though, you can find out more about advanced segmentation in Mailchimp here.
Finally, AWeber allows you to send e-newsletters across multiple lists — Mailchimp doesn’t. Although it’s usually better to use one list and segment it properly, there are occasions where you might need to broadcast e-newsletters across a variety of individual lists.
So overall, it’s a bit of a win here for AWeber, due to the fact that the product allows you to send emails to multiple lists. But both products could do rather better in the segmentation department.
Nice touches in AWeber: stock images and a Canva integration
One nice feature in AWeber which isn’t currently available in Mailchimp is a free stock images library.
You can use this to insert royalty-free photography into your e-newsletters — this is handy for all those times you need a generic looking picture of a computer keyboard to use as a thumbnail!
Mailchimp users can still avail of free stock photography for their e-newsletters of course; they’ll just have to source it from a royalty free photo site like Unsplash or Pexels.
A related AWeber feature which is worth flagging up is its new integration with the popular graphic design tool Canva. This lets you create Canva designs without ever leaving the AWeber interface — and insert the results into the e-newsletters you create with AWeber.
The below video gives an overview of how this integration works.
An important feature of email marketing tools like AWeber and Mailchimp is split testing.
This allows you to try out different subject headers or content on sample data to see which works best.
For example, you could send two versions of your e-newsletter to 10% of your subscribers, analyse the results (i.e., open / clickthrough rates) and send out the best-performing version to the remainder of people on your list.
If you have a large mailing list, use of split testing can lead to significant improvements to your open and clickthrough rates. So, many email marketing tools automate the process for you.
On the ‘Essential’ and ‘Standard’ Mailchimp plan — the ones that are broadly comparable to AWeber in price — you can test 3 different versions of your emails against each other. You can involve one variable in these tests: subject line, name, content or send time.
More sophisticated split testing options are available in Mailchimp if you’re prepared to pay for them — subscribers to Mailchimp’s ‘Premium’ plan can test 8 variants of e-newsletters against each other (and using multiple variables at once — sender, subject header, content etc.).
This is undoubtedly useful, but as this will cost you a small fortune every month ($299+), it’s probably going to be a feature that only large organisations, with correspondingly large budgets, will avail of.
AWeber also lets you test 3 versions of your newsletters against each other — but importantly, there are no restrictions on what you can test. You can simply put 3 e-newsletters head to head — testing content, subject headers, sender names etc. against each other all at once.
So on balance, when it comes to split testing, it’s a win for AWeber.
RSS to e-newsletter
Mailchimp and AWeber both allow you to send out e-newsletters automatically based on an RSS feed (i.e., every time it gets updated, it will trigger a newsletter).
In Mailchimp, you can use any template to do so, but with AWeber, you’re restricted to using a set of rather dated, hard-to-edit templates.
This has negative implications for the consistency of your branding across your communications — you might spend some time, for example, creating a slick template in AWeber for your e-newsletters only to find that you can’t use it for broadcasting blog posts.
Landing pages — also known as ‘squeeze pages’ — are web pages that are designed with just one goal in mind: data capture.
They typically consist of a form, some attractive images and a small amount of text spelling out the benefit of submitting your email address.
Landing pages capture data more effectively than forms placed on regular websites, simply because there’s less elements on view to distract users from entering their data — no navigation, offers or content to take attention away from a sign-up form are usually present.
Both Mailchimp and AWeber recently introduced landing pages as a new feature — you can now use both platforms to design simple landing pages which can be used in conjunction with advertising campaigns.
This is because they don’t facilitate A/B testing, where variants of the landing pages are shown to a sample of users, with the highest-converting ones being automatically rolled out.
Mailchimp’s landing pages do let you view analytics on the performance of your landing pages however, allowing you to perform manual tests and make your own decisions regarding which landing pages are performing best. This does add value to proceedings.
AWeber doesn’t seem to offer a similar set of statistics for landing pages (you’ll have to manually track hits and conversions using Google Analytics), meaning Mailchimp’s landing pages have the edge when it comes to reporting.
Tip: if landing pages are very important to your business, we’d suggest taking a look at Getresponse, which offers landing pages that offer much more comprehensive split testing functionality. Read more about GetResponse’s landing pages here.
Website building tools and ecommerce
In recent years, many email marketing products have started to add website building and ecommerce features to their feature sets — and AWeber and Mailchimp are no exception here.
In the case of AWeber, you can now use the platform to take payments, accept donations or sell subscriptions. This is done through its landing pages feature (discussed above).
Mailchimp’s offering on this front is more developed: you actually get a fully fledged website / online store builder bundled with your account (even the free Mailchimp plan includes this).
Now, it has to be said that these features are not yet going to rival dedicated website building platforms like Shopify or Squarespace in the functionality stakes — but they may come in handy for some users, particularly those who like having everything in one place, or those on a low budget.
Of the two products under discussion here however, Mailchimp currently offers the better features for website building and ecommerce.
Both AWeber and Mailchimp provide you with detailed statistics on the performance of your mailouts with — in my view — Mailchimp having the better reporting interface and one that is more feature packed.
It’s laid out in a way that makes drilling down into particular bits of data very straightforward — you can view e-newsletter results by activity (opens and clicks etc.), URLs clicked, social activity, ecommerce, conversations and Google Analytics.
There are two particularly nifty features in Mailchimp that are worth singling out for attention:
a ‘member rating’ system – Mailchimp reviews how engaged each member of your mailing list is (based on opens, clicks and purchases) and assigns them a member rating (using a five point scale). This allows you to identify particularly ‘good’ members of your mailing list easily and craft specific communications for them.
the option to compare your list’s performance against industry standards (i.e., you tell Mailchimp what sort of business you’re operating and it will compare your stats against campaigns by similar businesses).
AWeber is not without its strong features when it comes to reporting either however, and I particularly like the way that you can create segments directly from reports (i.e., you can look at a report for a particular e-newsletter broadcast, go to a list of people who’ve opened that email, and target them with a new communication on the spot).
This is not easily doable in Mailchimp: to create a segment of subscribers based on clickthroughs or open rates, you need to open your report, export a list of the relevant subscribers, and then re-import it (making sure that there is a field which flags the fact that these subscribers have engaged with the mailout). Messy!
However, Mailchimp does surface contacts (on its ‘Audience’ dashboard) who generally engage often, occasionally and seldom with your emails, and provides an easy way to retarget them.
AWeber and Mailchimp both integrate with important ecommerce and social platforms — key examples include BigCommerce, Paypal and Facebook.
AWeber offers more integrations however: around 750 to Mailchimp’s 300 or so.
Mailchimp is more of an industry standard tool than AWeber, however, so some important services — key examples being Squarespace and Facebook— will offer Mailchimp as a built-in, ‘works out of the box’ email marketing integration.
When it comes to Facebook ads, Mailchimp is more tightly integrated with the platform. You can actually run Facebook ad campaigns from within your Mailchimp account, so if you’re the kind of user who wants to manage everything in one place, you may find this useful.
A similar feature exists in Mailchimp for running Google Ads too.
Send time optimization
A good feature that is included in Mailchimp which is unfortunately not present in AWeber is ‘Send Time Optimization’.
Send time optimization is a sophisticated tool which automatically sends your e-newsletter at the time at which it is most likely to be opened.
This time is calculated by Mailchimp based on looking at when the subscribers on your list have previously opened mail — it can work this out based on looking at the campaigns you’ve previously sent and also by using data from campaigns sent by other Mailchimp users involving email addresses that are also present on your list.
As Mailchimp explains:
Since MailChimp has 4+ million users, we look globally at each email address’ engagement in deciding the best time to send to your list. Chances are the email addresses on your list receive email from other MailChimp users. That means that even if you’ve never sent to your list or only sent a few times, we can still provide a recommendation.Mailchimp support
It would be great if AWeber could consider adding this functionality, as it has the potential to significantly increase open rates.
Using different languages in Mailchimp and AWeber
For users wishing to provide versions of their confirmation emails and thank-you pages in different languages, Mailchimp is a better choice than AWeber, as it provides this functionality out of the box.
Setting this up is a bit fiddly however, and involves creating different merge tags for each language.
In general, AWeber has the edge when it comes to customer support, giving you phone support, live chat and email support on all plans; by contrast, Mailchimp only provides email and live chat support on its more affordable plans — and only after you’ve been forced to search their website for an answer to your query first!
Phone support is available on the Mailchimp ‘Premium’ plan, but as discussed elsewhere in this comparison, ‘Premium’ really does mean premium: a cost of at least $299+ per month.
AWeber’s phone support is 8am-8pm ET, Monday to Friday, and its live chat / email support is available 24/7. The company has won several Stevie awards for their customer service over the past few years too, which speaks well for the quality of their support.
So if you are a complete novice to email marketing, but don’t have the resource to hire somebody in to set your e-newsletter campaigns up, the availability of phone support for AWeber is something bear strongly in mind as an important advantage of using the platform.
Indeed, phone support is something of a USP for the product, given that many of of its leading competitors simply don’t offer it.
However, Mailchimp does have a linguistic advantage over AWeber when it comes to customer support — its phone and live chat support is available in English, Spanish and French, whereas AWeber’s is only provided in English. Additionally, Mailchimp’s Help Centre articles are available in English, Spanish, French, Brazilian Portuguese and German.
But so long as you’re happy to access customer support in English, it’s probably a win in the support department for AWeber.
Alternatives to Mailchimp and AWeber
Before deciding conclusively on Mailchimp and AWeber, it’s worth taking a quick look at some alternatives:
As you’ve possibly picked up on by now, for me, the obvious alternative to both Mailchimp and AWeber is GetResponse.
Depending on your list size, it will usually come in cheaper than both Mailchimp and AWeber (particularly if you pay upfront for a year or two years), and it’s feature packed (offering more sophisticated landing pages, webinars and ecommerce tools in addition to the features outlined above).
And it is much more flexible than either Mailchimp or AWeber when it comes to emailing segmented data and managing multiple lists.
To help you get a sense of the differences between GetResponse, AWeber, and Mailchimp, you may find the following resources useful:
And you can try GetResponse free here.
Hubspot is a good choice for users who wish to tightly integrate their customer relationship management (CRM) with their email marketing; it’s also great for anybody who’s serious about tying both in with an inbound marketing campaign.
A generous free email marketing plan is available with Hubspot too — you can access this here.
Another option is Campaign Monitor — this is a feature-rich tool which provides some very attractive templates (arguably best-in-class), along with strong functionality in the segmentation and marketing automation departments.
However, it’s extremely expensive by comparison to any of the other products under discussion here. Read our Campaign Monitor review for more information.
Mad Mimi is one of the cheapest email marketing tools available — but also one of the most basic.
It’s good for users who just want to send very simple e-newsletters or run basic drip campaigns and don’t have much in the way of a budget.
But it’s not in the same league as the other products under discussion in this comparison, especially Mailchimp and Getresponse. Check out our Mad Mimi review for more details.
AWeber vs Mailchimp conclusion
Overall, both AWeber and Mailchimp are both solid, well-established tools that you can use to create and send professional e-newsletters with. Either, used correctly, can help you grow your email database and contribute the success of your business. AWeber outshines Mailchimp when it comes to ease of use, bang-for-buck, and support. Mailchimp is, however, the more fully-featured tool, providing automation functionality that is far more sophisticated than what’s on offer from AWeber, and website building features too.
Here are the key reasons you might want to use one of these platforms over the other:
Reasons to use AWeber over Mailchimp
- Its free plan doesn’t restrict many features.
- It’s considerably cheaper.
You can code your own templates on any AWeber plan — Mailchimp charges a premium for this.
Autoresponders are a bit easier to set up (albeit far more basic in nature) than in Mailchimp.
There are significantly more templates available in AWeber (700+ to Mailchimp’s 85 or so).
No send limits apply.
You can use AMP for email in AWeber.
Although AWeber’s user interface is more ‘old-school’ and not as pretty as Mailchimp’s, it’s arguably a bit easier to use, and key features are more easily accessible.
The e-newsletter builder makes editing text slightly easier than in Mailchimp.
You get access to a library of stock images with AWeber that you can use in your mailouts for free.
- The product integrates neatly with graphic design tool Canva.
You can send to multiple lists at once in AWeber; Mailchimp doesn’t facilitate this.
The AWeber support options are more extensive — phone support, email support and live chat are available on all plans; Mailchimp doesn’t provide phone support except on its most expensive ‘Premium’ offering.
Reasons to use Mailchimp over AWeber
Its free plan lets you email more subscribers (the Mailchimp limit is 2,000; AWeber’s is 500).
If you have a small list (less than 500 records), you can host it more cheaply with Mailchimp.
Autoresponder and marketing automation functionality is significantly better — so long as you’re on a ‘Standard’ plan or higher.
- A website building tool is provided on all plans, even the free one.
RSS to email functionality can be used on all Mailchimp templates — AWeber forces you to use some rather dated templates if you want to trigger e-newsletters via RSS.
A much wider range of integrations with third party apps is available.
Send time optimization functionality is available.
Using different languages for thank-you and confirmation pages is more doable out-of-the-box.
Its landing page creator reports on the success of your landing pages.
- Support is available in more languages.
Got any thoughts or questions on Mailchimp and AWeber?
If you’ve got any queries on Mailchimp vs AWeber, I’d love to hear them — just scroll down and add a comment below (I do my best to answer each one!).
Mailchimp vs AWeber FAQ
Can I use Mailchimp and AWeber for free?
Both Mailchimp and AWeber provide free plans. These put adverts on your newsletters and cap the numbers of subscribers you can have on a list (to 2,000 and 500 respectively) — but nonetheless provide a good way to try the platforms out and get started with email marketing.
Which is more expensive, Mailchimp or AWeber?
Mailchimp is the more expensive product — its ‘Standard’ plans (which are broadly comparable with the AWeber ones) come in about $25-$110 per month more expensive than AWeber’s, depending on your list size.
Which has more features, Mailchimp or AWeber?
In general, Mailchimp is the more fully-featured product, giving you access to email marketing automation tools and website building features that aren’t available in AWeber.
Which is easier to use, Mailchimp or AWeber?
Whilst neither product comes with an especially steep learning curve, I would argue that on balance AWeber is slightly easier to use. This is mainly because Mailchimp’s interface is based around icons (which can sometimes be hard to interpret), while AWeber makes use of a more traditional text-based menu system.